Repository logo
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Schools
    Felizberta Lo Padilla Tong School of Social SciencesIp Ying To Lee Yu Yee School of Humanities and LanguagesRita Tong Liu School of Business and Hospitality ManagementS.K. Yee School of Health SciencesYam Pak Charitable Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences
  • Help
Repository logo
  1. Home
  2. Health Sciences
  3. HS Publication
  4. "We are not ready for restraint free.": Decision-making experiences of family members in physical restraint on older people in residential care homes
 
  • Details

"We are not ready for restraint free.": Decision-making experiences of family members in physical restraint on older people in residential care homes

Author(s)
Kwong, Alice Nga Lai  
Low, Lisa Pau Le  
Chan, Eric Lu Shek  
Lo, Jocasta Chui Kam  
Date Issued
2025
Conference
International Conference of Dementia Innovation Readiness
Abstract
Purpose Family members are involved in making decisions about physical restraint (PR), yet there is limited understanding of their experiences and attitudes regarding restraint practices for their older relatives living in residential care homes (RCHs). This study aims to explore family members’ decision-making experiences concerning the use of PR on their relatives in RCHs. Methods A qualitative study with individual interviews was conducted. Purposive sampling was employed to recruit 27 family members of their older relatives in three RCHs in Hong Kong. Data was thematically analysed. Results Two major themes were identified: “Experiencing the process of consenting to apply PR” and “Overcoming tension between physical safety and emotional wellbeing”. Participants’ decision-making process was rather quick, as they accepted the use of PR for maintaining their relatives’ physical safety. They often tended to agree with the staff to apply PR and had no idea about interventions that could serve as alternatives to PR. However, they mentioned that they lacked comprehensive information before consenting to the use of PR on their older relatives. Frequent visits to their older relatives and proactive communication between staff and family members were perceived by the participants as beneficial to manage their conflicting their emotions regarding PR decisions. Conclusions This study provides increased awareness of family members’ views surrounding the use of PR, showing that they are not ready for restraint-free care. Continued research is needed to develop practical guidelines and policy implications for RCHs to support family members in making informed decisions about applying PR on their older relatives.
URI
https://repository.sfu.edu.hk/handle/sfu/4812
SFU Affiliated Publication
Yes
Availability at SFU Library

No database links found.

Responsible Use of E‑Resources | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
© SFU Library. All Rights Reserved.
SFU Library