Repository logo
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Schools
    Felizberta Lo Padilla Tong School of Social SciencesIp Ying To Lee Yu Yee School of Humanities and LanguagesRita Tong Liu School of Business and Hospitality ManagementS.K. Yee School of Health SciencesYam Pak Charitable Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences
  • Help
Repository logo
  1. Home
  2. Social Sciences
  3. SS Publication
  4. Residential care for older people – A comparison between Hong Kong and Shanghai
 
  • Details

Residential care for older people – A comparison between Hong Kong and Shanghai

Author(s)
Chong, Alice Ming Lin  
Date Issued
2009
Publisher
Routledge
Journal
Journal of Comparative Asian Development
Volume
8
Issue
1
Start page
67
End page
104
Abstract
Hong Kong and Shanghai are the first two cities in China to become ageing societies. As a result of longevity, advancement in medical technology, the change in family structure and the decrease in family size, residential care has become an important service for older people, who require assistance in their daily living due to physical or cognitive impairments. This paper seeks to undertake first, a review of the policy development in the past two decades and to examine the existing service provision in residential care in the two cities. Then, the different aspects of residential care industry in the two cities are compared. Both cities are expected to experience rapid population ageing. Nonetheless, both of them have been proactive in facing this challenge by expanding and improving their residential care, and by involving the non-government sector in the provision of residential care. Hence, the marked increase in residential places in the past decade has been seen more in the non-government sector than in the publicly funded homes. The rate of increase is especially steep in Shanghai because of its much stronger commitment, enthusiasm and creativity in attracting the non-government sector. However, despite the significant increase, the number of available beds covers only 2.5% of the older population in Shanghai. In Hong Kong, the figure stands higher at 7%. However, inasmuch as 60% of these beds are provided by the profit-oriented private sector whose service quality is dubious, and a very long waiting list for publicly funded homes remains. Therefore, the challenge for Hong Kong is to improve the service quality of the private sector. In contrast, the challenge for Shanghai lies in improving the service quality as well as in increasing the quantity.
URI
https://repository.sfu.edu.hk/handle/sfu/4009
DOI
10.1080/15339114.2009.9678474
SFU Affiliated Publication
No
Availability at SFU Library

No database links found.

Responsible Use of E‑Resources | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
© SFU Library. All Rights Reserved.
SFU Library