Repository logo
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Schools
    Felizberta Lo Padilla Tong School of Social SciencesIp Ying To Lee Yu Yee School of Humanities and LanguagesRita Tong Liu School of Business and Hospitality ManagementS.K. Yee School of Health SciencesYam Pak Charitable Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences
  • Help
Repository logo
  1. Home
  2. Health Sciences
  3. HS Publication
  4. An examination of subgroup classification in irritable bowel syndrome patients over time: A prospective study
 
  • Details

An examination of subgroup classification in irritable bowel syndrome patients over time: A prospective study

Author(s)
Smith, Graeme Drummond  
Author(s)
Penny, K. I.
Ramsay, D.
Steinke, D. T.
Kinnear, M.
Penman, I. D.
Date Issued
2008
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal
International Journal of Nursing Studies
Volume
45
Issue
12
Start page
1715
End page
1720
Abstract
Background Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a complex functional gastrointestinal disorder which to date remains poorly understood. Therapies for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients are usually aimed at relieving the predominant symptom; however, little evidence exists as to whether or not the predominant symptom changes with time. Nurses are becoming increasingly involved in the assessment and management of IBS patients. Objectives To categorise IBS patients into one of three sub-types, namely diarrhoea-predominant, constipation-predominant and a third group who alternate between the two, and to investigate changes in patient sub-type classification over time. Design Observational cohort study. Setting The general population of the United Kingdom (UK). Methods A cohort of 494 IBS patients, with a confirmed Rome II classification diagnosis, was recruited in the UK. Patients’ IBS symptoms were recorded throughout a 26-week period. Proportions of individuals in each IBS subgroup were calculated and probabilities of moving from one subgroup to another between consecutive weeks were estimated. Results The percentage of patients given an overall subgroup classification of diarrhoea-predominant IBD (D-IBS) is 40.9%; 58.1% and 1% were classified as belonging to the alternator (A-IBS) and constipation-predominant (C-IBS) subgroups, respectively. Patients classified as an alternator or as diarrhoea-predominant have a high probability (0.67 and 0.71, respectively) of remaining in the same subgroup; however this probability is lower for constipation-predominant patients (0.35). Conclusion Although many patients remain in the same IBS subgroup classification over time, there are individuals whose subgroup classification varies. As such, patients’ IBS subgroup classification should be reviewed regularly and treatment adjusted accordingly in order to optimise patient care.
URI
https://repository.sfu.edu.hk/handle/sfu/1787
DOI
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.04.004
SFU Affiliated Publication
No
Availability at SFU Library

No database links found.

Responsible Use of E‑Resources | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
© SFU Library. All Rights Reserved.
SFU Library