Repository logo
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Schools
    Felizberta Lo Padilla Tong School of Social SciencesIp Ying To Lee Yu Yee School of Humanities and LanguagesRita Tong Liu School of Business and Hospitality ManagementS.K. Yee School of Health SciencesYam Pak Charitable Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences
  • Help
Repository logo
  1. Home
  2. Health Sciences
  3. HS Publication
  4. The technology of different designs of pillows on reducing neck pain, disability and spinal alignment: A systematic review and meta-analysis
 
  • Details

The technology of different designs of pillows on reducing neck pain, disability and spinal alignment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author(s)
Pang, Johnson Chun Yiu
Author(s)
Tsang, S. M. H.
Fu, A. C. L.
Date Issued
2021
Conference
12th Pan-Pacific Conference on Rehabilitation
Abstract
Background: Neck pain has high prevalent condition that affects adversely both quality of life, sleep quality and productivity at work. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to identify randomized controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of different designs of pillows in neck pain. Objective: To conduct a systematic review that assessed all available clinical trials to study the technology of different designs of pillows on reducing neck pain, disability and spinal alignment. Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control studies were collected by searching a series of keywords in six databases. Two independent reviewers were used to review the articles and assign a PEDro score. Thirty-five pillow articles that met the criteria to be included in this study. Results: Nine high-quality studies, 555 participants were included. The average PEDro score was 6.56/10. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant standardized mean difference values in favor of pillow intervention to reduce waking pain (-0.263, P<0.001), neck disability (-0.506, P=0.02) and satisfaction rate (1.144, P<0.001). The findings of this systematic review suggest that rubber and spring pillows may have better performance than feather pillows. In side-lying positions, the cervical segments were stable showed in 3-D motion analysis; while there is no study investigate the change of cervical segments in supine lying. Although 150 of cervical angle in supine lying has been recommended, there is no more literature support for this recommendation. Conclusion: Spring and rubber pillows are effective on waking pain, disability and pillow satisfaction in chronic neck pain patients because the alignment of the cervical spine can be maintained with appropriate pillow supports. Alignment of the cervical spine may be impacted more significantly by the shape and height of the pillow than materials.
URI
https://repository.sfu.edu.hk/handle/sfu/2233
SFU Affiliated Publication
Yes
Availability at SFU Library

No database links found.

Responsible Use of E‑Resources | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
© SFU Library. All Rights Reserved.
SFU Library