Repository logo
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Schools
    Felizberta Lo Padilla Tong School of Social SciencesIp Ying To Lee Yu Yee School of Humanities and LanguagesRita Tong Liu School of Business and Hospitality ManagementS.K. Yee School of Health SciencesYam Pak Charitable Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences
  • Help
Repository logo
  1. Home
  2. Social Sciences
  3. SS Publication
  4. Retirement protection on one's own: Retirement readiness and worries among middle-income earners in Hong Kong
 
  • Details

Retirement protection on one's own: Retirement readiness and worries among middle-income earners in Hong Kong

Author(s)
Ng, Felix Sai Kit
Lau, Michael Sik Wai  
Chu, Cheong Hay  
Luk, Yiu Tung  
Lee, Felix Ping Hei
Wong, Yu Cheung  
Date Issued
2025
Publisher
Routledge
Journal
Journal of Asian Public Policy
Volume
18
Issue
1
Start page
43
End page
58
Abstract
Even as the world increasingly tends towards pension privatization, Hong Kong’s privatized pension system remains an extreme example. In the former British colony, retirement protection depends heavily on personal savings and investments, a dependency that the Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) scheme further institutionalized beginning in 2000. Even so, Hong Kong’s government continues to maintain a means-tested zero pillar to assist its population of disadvantaged older adults. Against that background, in our exploratory study we surveyed middle-income earners 50–59 years old who rely on private and MPF-accrued savings for retirement in order to characterize their retirement readiness and anxiety about retirement risks. In the process, we also critically examined the individualization of retirement protection in order to better understand the biopolitics of older adults’ transitions into retirement. The results suggest that because individuals in Hong Kong are responsible for financial planning to protect their own retirement, they have to both proactively prepare for retirement and work as long as possible to manage retirement risks. Such a paradox of biopolitics requires a critical rethinking of individualized and financialized retirement protection.
URI
https://repository.sfu.edu.hk/handle/sfu/3784
DOI
10.1080/17516234.2023.2175636
SFU Affiliated Publication
Yes
Availability at SFU Library

No database links found.

Responsible Use of E‑Resources | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
© SFU Library. All Rights Reserved.
SFU Library