Repository logo
  • Research Outputs
  • Researchers
  • Schools
    Felizberta Lo Padilla Tong School of Social SciencesIp Ying To Lee Yu Yee School of Humanities and LanguagesRita Tong Liu School of Business and Hospitality ManagementS.K. Yee School of Health SciencesYam Pak Charitable Foundation School of Computing and Information Sciences
  • Help
Repository logo
  1. Home
  2. Health Sciences
  3. HS Publication
  4. To evaluate the effect of challenge-based learning on the approaches to learning of Chinese nursing students: A quasi-experimental study
 
  • Details

To evaluate the effect of challenge-based learning on the approaches to learning of Chinese nursing students: A quasi-experimental study

Author(s)
Chow, Meyrick Chum Ming  
Author(s)
Tang, A. C. Y.
Date Issued
2020
Publisher
Elsevier
Journal
Nurse Education Today
Volume
85
Abstract
Challenge-based learning (CBL) is a learner-centred, experimental learning strategy that aims to prepare students to manage unforeseeable and complex global issues in the 21st century. It cultivates an active and authentic learning environment that requires students' creative input, collaboration and community involvement. Studies in the past decade have shown that CBL strengthens soft skills essential for future society, such as critical thinking and creativity. However, its effect on students' metacognitive abilities is scarcely mentioned. This study – a quasi-experimental study with non-equivalent groups conducted in a self-financing tertiary institution in Hong Kong – aims to evaluate the effect of CBL on approaches to learning among nursing students. First-year students in the nursing programme who attended a nursing course using CBL were recruited for the intervention group and senior year-one students were included in the control group. Their approach to learning was measured by the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire administered at the beginning and at the end of the semester. Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was used to compare the mean difference in scores of deep and surface approaches between the groups. A total of 209 participants were recruited, with 130 in the intervention group and 79 in the control group. The response rates were 65.3% (130/199) and 78.2% (79/101) for the intervention and control groups, respectively. In the intervention group, the mean post-test deep approach score was significantly higher than the pre-test score (F = 5.2, p = 0.023), even though it had only a small effect. There was no statistically significant difference in baseline post-test mean surface scores (F = 2.4, p = 0.125). The results of this study indicate that CBL may facilitate deep learning in nursing students.
URI
https://repository.sfu.edu.hk/handle/sfu/4580
DOI
10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104293
SFU Affiliated Publication
No
Availability at SFU Library

No database links found.

Responsible Use of E‑Resources | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer
© SFU Library. All Rights Reserved.
SFU Library